Preoperatieve geriatrische screening in zorgpad ‘AAA’

Aim

Determining the added value of preoperative geriatric screening (POGS) in the care path ‘Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm’.

Design

Retrospective observational study in a university hospital.

Method

For patients (>60 years) with non-acute aortic pathology, data on preoperative screening (including frailty measures) and treatment was automatically generated from medical records for the period 2018-2021 (42 months). Data has been analysed with descriptive and test statistics. Completeness of the data was checked manually by reading the medical files for the period 2020-2021 (24 months).

Results

A total of 343 cases were included; POGS was performed in 90 patients (26%). In 84.2% of the cases the vascular surgeon adhered to the geriatrician's advice. In the other cases, the treatment is less (10.5%) or more (5.3%) intrusive than the POGS advice; the patient’s preference seems to be particular decisive here. The geriatric advice is most consistent with the measures from the Clinical Frailty Scale. From the manual data collection, we learned that about 20% of the POGS were missing.

Conclusion

Introducing geriatric screening in the care pathway is likely to lead to a more considered choice by healthcare professionals as well as patients. The added value seems embraced by geriatricians and vascular surgeons as the adherence to the geriatric advice is strong. A cardiovascular nurse can use the Clinical Frailty Scale to select the patients that really need a geriatric advice. The advice is to include POGS in the care path ‘Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm’ and possibly also in other care paths.

Conflict of interest and financial support: potential conflicts of interest have been reported for this article. ICMJE forms provided by the authors are available online along with the full text of this article.