Ingewilligde, onbesliste, ingetrokken en geweigerde verzoeken om euthanasie en hulp bij zelfdoding in Nederland; 2000-2002

To determine the characteristics of patients who request euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide and whether these characteristics differ among those whose request is granted, those who die before the procedure, those who die before completion of the approval process, those who withdraw their request, and lastly, those whose request is refused by the physician.

Design

Questionnaire study.

Method

All general practitioners in 18 of the 23 Dutch general practitioner districts received a written questionnaire in which they were asked to describe the most recent request for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide that they had received (response 60, n = 3614).

Results

Of all explicit requests, 44 resulted in euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. Thirteen percent of patients died before the procedure, 13 died before completion of the approval process, 13 withdrew their request and 12 were refused by the physician. The most prominent symptoms were ‘feeling bad’, ‘tiredness’, and ‘lack of appetite’. The most frequently mentioned reasons for requesting euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide were ‘pointless suffering’, ‘loss of dignity’, and ‘general weakness’. The patients’ situation met the official requirements for accepted practice best in the group of requests that resulted in euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide and least in the group of refused requests. A lesser degree of competence and less unbearable and hopeless suffering had the strongest associations with the refusal of a request.

Conclusion

The complexity of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide decision-making is reflected in the fact that, besides granting and refusing a request, 3 other situations could be distinguished. The decisions physicians made, the reasons for their decisions and the way they arrived at their decisions appeared to be based on patient evaluations and on the official requirements for accepted practice.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006;150:249-54