Antina de Jong
,Wybo J. Dondorp
enGuido M.W.R. de Wert
-
In the Netherlands prenatal diagnosis after screening for chromosomal abnormalities is done by karyotyping and is restricted to pregnant women with an increased risk of a child with trisomy 21, 18 or 13. However, karyotyping will detect a wider range of chromosomal abnormalities. .
-
Replacing karyotyping by rapid aneuploidy diagnosis (RAD) – a test with a more narrow scope – is currently under discussion.
-
A possible drawback of RAD is that some rare but clinically relevant abnormalities may be missed. A possible advantage is that pregnant women will not be confronted with outcomes that the screening was not initially directed at.
-
Each delineation of the scope of prenatal testing implies a normative choice that requires justification.
-
Moral principles can be invoked for both narrowing down and further broadening of the scope of testing.
Indienen manuscript
Meld u aan voor de wekelijkse e-alert met de actuele inhoudsopgave.


Reacties
Prenatale diagnostiek: breed of smal?